Blogs

There’s something almost magical about the backpacking stove – after a long day of hiking to near exhaustion and perhaps through a chilly rain, there’s nothing like getting a hot meal going and eating a steaming meal to warm the soul so to speak. But poetic license aside, when we hit the trail we need a stove that’s lightweight and reliable. Due to varying performance at different ambient temperatures, the best choice will vary by season.

While alcohol stoves were all the rage among ultralight backpackers 15-20 years ago, they are slow, the weight they save is debatable, and if a spill were to occur while running it could be a bad situation (not great with a canister stove either, however). They are perhaps best suited for ultralight overnights, or for the backpacker who doesn’t want to throw away or recycle gas canisters – an admirable approach.
In a similar fashion, venerable liquid gas stoves like the MSR WhisperLite aren’t slow, but can (will in my experience) be messy, are heavy, and while offering reliable performance when it gets cold, I’ve found inverted canister stoves have been just fine on deep winter trips below 0F. While for the true backpacking chef liquid-fuel stoves are known for their simmering capability, I’m almost always wanting to eat whatever is fastest and easiest at the end of the day. When I do want to get fancy, quesadillas and the like are no problem on an upright canister stove – with the right technique and cookware – and I’ve found many modern upright canister stoves to simmer quite well.

Thus, my alcohol and liquid gas stoves now occupy a bin on a shelf in my gear room, and stay there – I use some type of canister stove now for every trip.
Best All-Around / 3-Season Backpacking Stoves
For all-around 3-season use with temperatures above freezing or a bit below that, we need not create a lengthy list here (the winter stove list will be even shorter!). With performance that seemingly cannot be surpassed, and for over a decade, the Soto WindMaster upright canister stove (2.4 to 3.1 ounces, $70) – find our Soto WindMaster review here – has been our go-to and top choice in this category since it has been released.

This stove isn’t perfect. I wish the pot supports were simply integrated into the stove…there are options for an ultralight removable 3 prong support, and offering more stability an option for a 4 prong support. However, even with the slightly heavier 4Flex support the stove weighs just 3 ounces and this support can be left on in a semi-permanent fashion and folds partially for easier packing.
I’ve also had the piezo igniter fail once in over a decade of backpacking trips with this stove. Carry a lighter for backup and in your emergency kit. The piezo was replaced and makes the stove easy to use – I prefer an integrated piezo igniter on a stove whenever I can get it. A stove should include a way to light itself.
Any cons now explained, the Soto WindMaster offers consistent performance across a wide range of conditions, temperatures, and canister fuel levels due to its micro regulator valve system. To explain as briefly as possible, a regulator on a stove will automatically adjust in regards to pressure of the canister – which changes based on ambient temperature, elevation, and due to the amount of gas left in the canister, to give you more consistent performance.

While the Soto micro regulator system oddly seemed to generate much controversy when released, it works. It does add some complexity to the design of the stove (while simplifying use), however using this stove compared to a non-regulated upright canister stove is night and day. Looking for a 3-season upright canister stove for backpacking? You can very much just get the Soto WindMaster with the 4Flex pot support with no looking back.
That said following the Soto WindMaster release, MSR released an update to their venerable PocketRocket series – the PocketRocket Deluxe (2.9 ounces, $85). You can read our full PocketRocket Deluxe stove review here.

Adding a regulator to their already popular stove series made this stove even better, and to give credit where credit is due, this stove has the best piezo system of any stove I’ve ever used. It’s more integrated, protected, easier to use, and just well designed – one of those things that you just like to use.
In our testing we didn’t find the MSR’s valve to have quite the effect when compared to the Soto, and at $85, it’s not cheap. That said, this is a solid stove and the integrated pot supports are just what the doctor ordered.

MSR's ignition system on the PocketRocket Deluxe is best in class.
If you are looking to save weight but save cash as well however, there are various, very cost-effective (and simple) upright canister stoves available that many backpackers have used with success. However, when it comes to this category and considering what we’re dealing with, I prefer to stick with more of a name brand.
For a non-regulated upright canister stove (best for warmer temps, you may want to toss the canister in your sleeping bag to keep it warm along with needing to use other tricks and being patient with slower performance), options like the Toaks Titanium Backpacking Stove (1.6 ounces, $30) and a personal, nostalgic favorite of mine that has stood the test of time – the Snow Peak GigaPower (4.23 ounces, $40) are both worth a look.

Various integrated all-in-one stove systems are available, however I do not typically like the tall / narrow cookpots that come with these systems and prefer to mix and match my own gear – see our backpacking cookware guide for more.
However, if you’re mostly boiling water, don’t mind the significant upfront weight (although they are fast and efficient), the cookpot included works for your cooking, and you need something as wind-resistant as possible these can be worth a look while knocking a cookpot off your list as well. The MSR WindBurner Personal Stove System (16 ounces, $200) is unique here in that it features a radiant burner with MSR claiming it to be windproof with a capacity good for 2 typical freeze dried meals. There is no igniter on this stove and MSR recommends a lighter or match.
Summary: Best Overall & 3-season Backpacking Stoves
Soto WindMaster 4Flex
Soto WindMaster w/ TriFlex & 4Flex
MSR PocketRocket Deluxe
Toaks Titanium Backpacking Stove
Snow Peak Giga Power 2.0 Auto
MSR WindBurner Personal Stove System
Best Winter Backpacking Stoves
If you were to choose one of the stoves above for most of your 3-season trips, as I have, you’ll need one more stove in the gear stash if you want to go backpacking year round and during the winter seasons. Upright canister stoves are simple, but pressure in the canister decreases as it gets colder. When it’s very cold, and we’ll likely be melting snow for water and running our stove for long durations (cooling the canister even more due to evaporative cooling), another solution is needed no matter how fancy of an upright canister stove you might have.

Traditionally, the solution for this was to use a liquid gas stove like the MSR WhisperLite series (15 ounces, $200). These stoves are still a good choice, however they need to be primed and in my experience, gas will inevitably leak or get spilled. There is something special about them when they’re running, but for my needs I’ll turn to an inverted canister solution here. That said, if you can’t decide between liquid gas and a remote inverted canister stove, the WhisperLite Universal has you covered.
By having the ability to turn the canister upside down with a remote canister setup, you can now enter a liquid feed mode, relying now on the omnipresent effect of gravity rather than the changing pressures within a canister. Additionally since the canister is remote, you can often use a windscreen (check directions, it's often included).

For a remote canister stove and as might be expected, we can turn to MSR here. Their WindPro II remote canister stove – you’ll be around 11 ounces all packed and this stove will cost you about $140 – has served me well with solid performance on those winter trips melting snow for water…below 0F type backpacking trips. For more on this stove, take a look at our WindPro II stove review. This stove is a bit heavy for me for a summer trip, but then again if I could only have one stove this would be it and I reach for it without hesitation when packing for a winter trip. Unfortunately, this stove doesn’t have a built-in ignition system. This can be solved by carrying an add-on piezo igniter.
Summary: Best Winter (Cold Weather) Backpacking Stoves
MSR WhisperLite Universal
MSR WhisperLite International
MSR WindPro II Remote Canister Stove
Best Backpacking Stoves: In Conclusion
If you want to backpack across all seasons and want to buy just one stove, go for a winter-capable stove and just carry the weight in the summer. You’ll be carrying around an extra half pound, however, and these stoves do take up more pack space. My preference is to have a dedicated winter stove and an upright canister stove for warmer and even shoulder season trips – regulated stoves are great for this but their additional performance can only do so much when the weather gets bitter cold.
For more on the best fuel to use for all these canister stoves we’ve discussed, check out our article on the best backpacking canister fuel. For more on different types of backpacking stoves, stove theory, and design considerations, see our guide on How to Choose the Best Backpacking Stove.
For a full selection of 3-season and winter-ready backpacking stoves of all types, see this page at REI Co-op.

November tends to be a dead zone for Colorado hikers. It's too early for skiing or even snowshoeing in the high country. But cold temps and the threat of blizzards are present even if the snow is lacking. Most backpackers sit out the month, maybe catching up on their favorite trail magazine. Not all Colorado is high country and 14er's though. Out beyond the West Elks, the Uncompahgre Plateau runs from the Utah border 60 miles southeast down to the edge of the San Juans. Elevations range from 4000 feet along the rivers to 9000 feet at the crest. The terrain is mostly a rolling plateau of pinyon-juniper grasslands.

Red rock canyons cut their way down from the plateau to the Gunnison River. Some of these are incorporated into the BLM’s Dominguez Canyon Wilderness, part of the larger Dominguez-Escalante National Conservation Area. The Big and Little Dominguez Canyons form one possible loop route from the Gunnison River up to the crest and back again. Only Big Dominguez canyon sports a maintained trail. But I had heard reports that the route was navigable. That was good enough for me.
Colorado had a second blast of winter in late October – a foot of snow with lows down to 5 degrees. But skies were clear as I cruised US50 toward Montrose, then turned down the gravel road to the trailhead on the Gunnison. I stepped out of the car into the chill sunshine, slung on my pack and commenced walking.
Lost Highway of the Uncompahgre
The trail starts along the river, crosses railroad tracks and then the river itself. It passes through a rafter campground and turns upstream at the junction with Dominguez Creek. Here Dominguez Canyon is a wide bottomland, the red rock walls of Entrada Sandstone spaced a good half-mile apart, a few hoodoos and pillars standing out on corners. The trail is a relict ranch road rolling smoothly through grasslands and groves. I passed the turnoff where the Big Dominguez trail heads west up its canyon and continued south along Little Dominguez Creek. After a few miles, the canyon takes a sharp right turn to the west and immediately leads into an ice-covered marsh. The ice being too thin to support my weight, I skirted it by a climb along the canyon wall.

The canyon then opens out in a series of benches and side gulches. Although the trail had disappeared, I snaked easily through the canyon, warmed by the low glare of the late afternoon sun. A high side bench above the cold damp creek bottom offered a good campsite, and I called it a day.
On the second day I was up before dawn and moving by 7, aiming to hike the last ten miles of the canyon and to spend the night up on the plateau. I like canyons, but I like open country even more. My pace slowed as I ascended and the canyon narrowed. The brush – willows near the creek and saltbrush on the benches – was thick and unyielding. The creek, which I crossed many times, was mostly too wide to jump and was often iced-over. The ice extended up the banks, as I discovered when I hopped across at a narrow spot and landed on a glazed rock. I went down in a sprawl, my face in the dirt and a foot in the creek.

I held out hope that the walking would get easier as I progressed up the canyon. Perhaps the vegetation would thin out or be replaced by forms more conducive to travel. The opposite occurred. There is just enough moisture in the canyon to grow the pinyons close together. Worse, thickets of Gambel Oak appeared, forcing me at times to crawl my way forward. Or to give up and backtrack and try a different side of the canyon altogether.
By late afternoon I had made it only half way to the head of the canyon. It was clear that I would not make it out by sunset. I pushed as far as I could, boxed in by endless walls of brush and steep crumbly canyon walls. The frustration got to me as I tired of fighting for every step forward. Feeling trapped, my progress glacial, I stopped and cursed and yelled into the silence. The canyon was indifferent. There was no parting of the brush, no light to guide me, no revelation of an easier path. No choice but to keep scrambling forward – or, just as often, sideways, trying to find a more passable route.

I managed to find a small sloping bench at sunset and set up my tarp by flashlight. I crawled in and collapsed, pretty well played out by the day’s exertions. But I like to end the day with a song on my trusty plastic ukulele. Today’s selection was “Lost Highway” by Hank Williams – “I’m a rolling stone, all alone and lost/ For a life of sin, I’ve paid the cost….” That seemed about right.
To start day 3 I was well behind my intended pace and was up and walking – or rather, thrashing – by 6. Scraps of trail appeared, giving me hope that the worst was behind me. They invariably ended in impenetrable thickets after a few hundred feet. I came to the bail-out point after a couple hours. I could see the old jeep road on the canyon wall above, but there was no obvious way to get to it. The canyon was not going to let me go without a fight. But after scrambling up a hundred yards of steep decaying red sandstone talus I finally tossed my hiking poles up and on to the old road. I was free of the canyon’s clutches.

I was finally able to link consecutive steps together and actually walk, even if the walk was a steep climb. I topped out on the plateau and began a pleasant walk on ranch roads that wind around the heads of various canyons, passing through classic pinyon-juniper country. Views of the western ranges abounded: the Grand Mesa directly across the Gunnison, the West Elks to the east, the Grenadiers to the south. It felt good to stretch my legs on an open trail and cast my gaze to distant ranges. Canyon country has its charms, but feels confining after a day or two. Give me a ridgewalk any day.
A Last Afternoon, Evening, and the Hike Out
I neared the head of Big Dominguez Canyon and began seeing ATVs filled with hunters out scouting the area. I took my afternoon break at the campground, and then hiked down the well-maintained trail into the canyon. Big D canyon also had an iced-over marsh, one that proved impossible to photograph with the sun low behind it. I continued along the trail, which mostly rides on benches above the stream. Coming to a wide flat spot with good views of the canyon walls, I decided to call it a day.
On the last day the trail continued and was easy to follow down the canyon. Its width allowed the sun to hit me much earlier in the morning, making for ideal walking temperatures. After a few miles I came to the first of the petroglyphs that are the star attraction of the canyon. The figures on horseback suggest that they are not more than 300 years old, when horses first made their way to these lands. Beside them were some cowboy inscriptions, dated to 150 years ago. Some abandoned mining equipment is a little further down the trail, probably less than 100 years old.

Questions of the difference between what defines historic artifacts, art, and so on occupied my thoughts – it seems age and strangeness perhaps both play some role. The minds and motives of the Ute artists are obscure to me; that of the miners and cowboys somewhat less so. What role does mystery in and of itself play? I ended my ruminations and scurried the remaining miles down the canyon, hoping to get to Grand Junction in time for lunch with my cousin. I stepped through the sun-filled canyon, eyes up on its amphitheaters and pillars, crossed the river and walked from my lost highway back to civilization.
Need to Know
Information
The lower few miles of Big and Little Dominguez Canyons are designated for day use only, no overnight camping. Water in the canyons is usually reliable, but is salty and as I found out, may cause some digestive distress. There are a few cow ponds on the plateau that may or may not hold water and what I found was barely palatable. For either source additional water treatment and processing may be on the agenda for a next trip to the area.
Best Time to Go
Best times to go generally are April-June and September-November. Hunting is popular in the area during the fall season. Most of the plateau roads are closed to all vehicles December-April.
Getting There
The Dominguez Canyon Wilderness is most-easily accessed from the Bridgeport Trailhead. From Grand Junction, drive approximately 20 miles southeast on US50 East. Turn right at Bridgeport Rd and follow it 5 miles to the parking area near the Gunnison River.
Maps and Books
The Trails Illustrated Uncompahgre Plateau North map 147 covers the Dominguez-Escalante National Conservation Area. This map is good for navigating roads and terrain, but be aware that in this area and in my experience, trails marked on maps may not exist on the ground and other trails may not exist on the map. For getting to and from the area and exploring other destinations in the state, the Delorme Colorado Atlas & Gazetteer and / or the Benchmark Colorado Atlas can be useful. Further mapping is provided for areas close by on the Trails Illustrated 146 map. There is also an Uncompahgre National Forest map available.
Editor's Note: This article by Drew "HappyHour" Smith originally appeared in Issue 45 of TrailGroove Magazine. You can read the original article here for additional photos and content.

As one of the most important decisions you can make when it comes to backpacking gear, your choice of a backpacking tent can have quite the impact in regards to your comfort in camp and protection from the elements. Additionally, choosing the best backpacking tent can also have an impact when it comes to weight carried on the trail (as one of, if not the heaviest items in your pack), and a tent decision can have quite the impact on your wallet, as well.

With many factors to consider, in this article we’ll look at the top backpacking tents currently on the market, with a preference towards tents that of course offer protection from the elements, but also are lightweight and include plenty of space for the weight (including headroom), while remaining sufficiently durable and easy to use. Additionally preference here leans towards tents that haven’t had any flame or fire retardant chemicals applied, and for tents that are easy to get in and out of and have space to store gear.
Best Solo & Ultralight Backpacking Tents
For solo use I look to save just about as much weight as possible and space is less of a concern – I find a little extra space to be much more useful and important when there’s more than one person sharing a tent. If it’s just me and in this day and age, I’ll look to go with a Dyneema Composite Fabric tent every time and will look for an ultralight tent under the 20 ounce mark or so. Previously my choice has been the (discontinued) Zpacks Hexamid Twin, which while designed for two was much more workable for one person having only a single side door and one vestibule. This tent however still only weighed around a pound.

An ultralight Dyneema Composite Fabric tent from Zpacks
Luckily there are modern-day alternatives available from Zpacks via their Plex Solo tent ($599, 14.5 oz.) as well as their Altaplex Solo tent ($699, 16.5 oz.), with the Altaplex being designed for taller hikers. I like a rectangular, non-tapering floorplan whenever I can get it no matter what tent I’m looking at, and as such the Altaplex would be an intriguing ultralight option. That said for those using standard-width pads who want the lightest pack, the Plex Solo and the Plex Solo Lite tent (a Plex Solo tent option featuring more ultralight materials and further weight savings) are equally interesting choices.
With the solo tent category one door and one vestibule work great, as can be found in the tent designs discussed above. However, especially for those that backpack with a wide pad and like space, the Duplex Lite tent ($699, 14.9 oz.) should be given strong consideration. The Duplex Lite is also an option for 2 with standard-width pads, who want to save as much weight as possible and don’t mind bumping elbows.
Regardless of which Zpacks tent you go with, I’d suggest at least considering their .75 oz. canopy material over the default .55 oz. Dyneema. I’ve used the .55 oz. material for years without issue – it’s not a bad default material and my tents have withstood years of use and severe weather. However, future DCF tents that I purchase will likely be of the .75 oz. variety just for all-around insurance.
The .75 oz. material will be stronger and offer greater puncture resistance, which may be appreciated over the long haul and when you need it, without too much of a weight penalty. As you might have guessed, Zpacks offering buyers the choice of this fabric option is one reason their tents are recommended so highly in this article. Note that as you might expect, their "Lite" tents are not offered in this heavier duty fabric, but are still worth consideration as the lightest of the light.

However, if you’re not sold on Dyneema and prefer a more traditionally-designed tent, one that does stand out in this category can be found in the NEMO Hornet Elite Osmo 1-Person tent ($600, 29 oz.). With 39” of headroom this tent may not be the most ideal choice for the tallest of users, but this height is on par with other tents in the more traditional, double-walled and freestanding (or semi-freestanding) tent market. At less than 2 pounds this tent will not weigh you down and can even fit a rectangular large and wide sleeping pad. If you’re looking to save some cash, NEMO also offers a standard version of the Hornet Osmo, which still comes in at a respectable weight with slightly smaller interior dimensions.
Summary: Best Solo & Ultralight Tents
Zpacks Plex Solo Standard
Zpacks Altaplex Classic
Zpacks Plex Solo Lite
Zpacks Duplex Lite
NEMO Hornet Osmo Elite
NEMO Hornet Osmo Standard
In summary if you’re looking for a Dyneema Composite Fabric (DCF) ultralight or solo tent and are open to a non-traditional design, Zpacks offers an excellent choice of floorplans and overall performance, and with the option of a heavier-duty DCF fabric for durability. For a more traditional design but still in the ultralight category, take a look at the NEMO Osmo series.
Best 2-Person Backpacking Tents
For a 2-person backpacking tent, I look for 2 doors with side entries and 2 matching vestibules, without question. This allows each person their own entry and exit (no having to crawl over anyone) and their own space to store gear at night. Generally, around 3lbs. or less is a good target here. For many years my go-to option here was the Six Moon Designs Lunar Duo ($395, 45 oz.). This tent features all the prerequisites above, but the weight of their lighter backpacking model (previously known as the Explorer model, and suggested if budget allows over their heavier Lunar Duo Outfitter) has crept up a bit in recent years.

The Six Moon Designs Lunar Duo 2-person backpacking tent
That said, the Lunar Duo backpacking model is not exactly heavy by any means and is a wonderful design with a 54x90” floorplan. This is one of the best floor measurements for a 2-person tent I’ve ever used. It’s long enough for tall hikers, wide enough for 2 wide pads, and isn’t excessive even with 2 standard pads…extra space is always nice. Additionally, the 45” centered height is great for sitting up in the tent. If at least one hiker uses a shorter pad, you can easily fit 2 people plus a dog or very small child in this tent as well, with gear being stored in the large vestibules. Find our Lunar Duo review here.
About the only downside to this tent is that, as with all silnylon / silpoly tents including those to follow from Tarptent, you’ll need to seal the seams with something like SeamGrip SIL seam sealer at home before you head out, although many manufacturers are now offering this as an add-on service. Many backpackers – including myself – have long hoped that Six Moon Designs would come out with a Dyneema Lunar Duo to take things from lightweight to ultralight...we’ll continue to keep our hopes up.

With its 90" long floor, the Lunar Duo from Six Moon Designs can fit 2 people with extra room, especially if at least one person utilizes a shorter sleeping pad.
For something lighter but significantly more expensive, the Zpacks Duplex tent ($749, 17.9 oz.) or the larger Zpacks Triplex Pro tent ($899, 22 oz.) are worth significant consideration. Zpacks tents are made from Dyneema Composite Fabric to save weight and you’ll end up with a tent that won’t sag in the rain like you can get with silnylon. At a 45” floor width, the Duplex will be tight for 2 people and both hikers will have to use standard-width sleeping pads, unless you want to absolutely max out the width of the floor with 1 wide and 1 regular-width sleeping pad…something I don’t recommend. The Triplex Pro however, at a 65” floor width could work for up to 3, but also has plenty of room for 2 people with wide pads and room for gear for those who like plenty of space.
Utilizing standard-width sleeping pads with the Triplex Pro can get you a 2+ person tent with room for a child or a dog for example, however for my use case the original Triplex (with a 60x90" floorplan – our Triplex review) was more versatile as a 2+ tent and offered more room for taller users. For a 2+ person tent that will fit wide pads, the LightHeart Gear Duo Tent ($340, 36 oz.) with its unique 55x100" floorplan is also worth a look and the longer floor makes fitting a dog in much easier.

The Zpacks Triplex offers room for 2 people using wide sleeping pads with room to spare.
Mainstream manufacturer Big Agnes makes some interesting tents in their Platinum and Carbon lines that are either freestanding or semi-freestanding, however there are some compromises to be had related to interior space or entry configuration (a side door, even when solo, is preferred). For example the Tiger Wall 2 Platinum tent ($700, 39 oz.) will get you a semi-freestanding tent for 2 using standard-width pads, but the 86” length and 39” peak height combined with a lengthwise sloping ceiling would be cramped for taller users.

In this category the Lunar Duo would be the closest tent to being a perfect fit for 2. That said, we’re not making a custom tent here and beggars can’t be choosers. For two using wide pads who also have a dog along, the aforementioned LightHeart Duo would be a better fit with the Zpacks Triplex Pro working for niche situations for 2 with standard-length wide pads who like room and gear (or maybe a dog) in the tent. These tents feature 2 doors and 2 vestibules.
Summary: Best 2-Person Backpacking Tents
Six Moon Designs Lunar Duo
Six Moon Designs Lunar Duo Outfitter
Zpacks Duplex
Zpacks Triplex Pro
LightHeart Gear Duo
Big Agnes Tiger Wall 2 Platinum
To summarize, the Zpacks Duplex would be more of an ultralight option for 2 with standard pads, while the LightHeart Duo or Zpacks Triplex Pro allows for maximum comfort / room for a dog or gear. The venerable Six Moon Designs Lunar Duo series offers a budget-friendly option with a perfect floor size for two. For a more traditional design, the Big Agnes Platinum tent is worth consideration.
Best Family or Group Backpacking Tents
There is not much discussion to be had here when it comes to the best group and family backpacking tent, as unfortunately it seems manufacturers pour most of their research and development into their 1 or 2-person tent designs. The Tarptent Hogback ($549, 63.2 oz.) is my choice in this category with few competitors. The Hogback is a 4-person tent that weighs in around 4 pounds and features an 86x86” floorplan that can fit up to 4 standard-width pads, or 3 wide pads, and features double-wall construction with either mesh or partial-solid fabric inner options. 4 people in the Hogback will be a squeeze and you’ll be fighting for vestibule space, but we’ve used it for 3 plus a dog on many occasions.

Tarptent Hogback 4-person backpacking tent
Although for years Tarptent declined to entertain the idea of making Dyneema Composite Fabric tents, in recent years they began to utilize this weight-saving non-stretch fabric, but it hasn’t made it up the line to the Hogback quite yet (which would save quite a bit of weight in a tent this large). That said, we’ve been quite happy with the silnylon fly utilized in our Hogback and about 4lbs is still quite light for a tent of this size. You can read our full Tarptent Hogback review here.
Although more of a backpacking shelter than a tent due to its floorless nature, the Black Diamond Mega Light tent ($500, 45 oz.) is also worth considering in this category and these tents and tents of a similar design have been successfully used by educational expeditions for many years. Depending on where you’re backpacking however, the extra bug and weather protection you get with an integrated floor like you’ll find on the Hogback may be appreciated.
There is an optional nest available for the Mega Light; however it more than doubles the weight and almost doubles the price. For a lighter option Hyperlite Mountain Gear offers their UltaMid 4 pyramid ($1440 as a tent, 62 oz. with the floored mesh insert and pole). With either of these shelters you'll need to be aware of some compromises pyramid shelters can have – like a pole in the center of the tent, slanted walls, typically one (relatively) small door for entry and exit, lack of vestibule space, and the possibility of rain getting into the tent when entering and exiting due to the slanted walls.

For freestanding options, the Copper Spur UL4 tent ($850, 88 oz.), with its larger (listed) 86x96” floorplan can fit 4 people with a couple of those people using wide pads, and this tent also has an impressive 50” inside height. In our testing getting this tent's floorplan to measure up to specs would be quite a stretch; thus we cannot recommend this tent maxed out with 3X wide pads along with 1 standard-width pad. That said the tent will fit 4 people all in the same tent, although you’ll be well over 5lbs. And if the UL4 still isn’t enough space, you can take a look at the 86x108” Copper Spur HV UL5 ($950, 117 oz.) which, as you might expect, is designed for groups of 5 and features 60” – or 5 feet, of headroom.
The Copper Spur UL line is typically a leader on the spec sheets – just be aware that to achieve light weight in a traditional design Big Agnes uses very light 15 and 20D fabrics that are lower on the hydrostatic head scale and feature a PU (polyurethane) coating. Coatings are very waterproof and allow manufacturers to tape seams, but coatings wear off, unlike impregnated silicone or Dyneema waterproof fabrics (it would be suggested to use a groundsheet – I use one made of window insulation film).
The recently updated and aforementioned Zpacks Triplex Pro with its 65x84” floorplan would work for 3 average sized people with standard length / regular width pads who aren’t too tall – and is about as light as you could get for this use case, but may be a bit short for taller users.
At some point and once the group size gets larger, taking multiple smaller separate tents may make the most sense and can even save weight over a single larger tent – although depending on your tent choice, this can potentially be more expensive.
Summary: Best Family or Group Backpacking Tents
Tarptent Hogback
Black Diamond Mega Light
HMG UltaMid 4
Big Agnes Copper Spur UL4
Big Agnes Copper Spur HV UL5
Zpacks Triplex Pro
For family and group tents the Tarptent Hogback is our choice, if your group will fit. The struts allow for good use of the 86x86” floorplan, but 86x86” is tight as group size approaches 4. The Black Diamond Mega Light and HMG UltaMid4 are pyramid options, which again are great if you fit and if you can deal with the drawbacks of the pyramid design, including inefficient use of floorspace. For more traditional designs, the Copper Spur series should be considered, however care will need to be exercised with the ultralight fabrics utilized. For 3 looking for the lightest possible solution, look no further than the Zpacks Triplex Pro.
Best Budget Backpacking Tents
Budget is relative, but for this category we can go ahead and rule out ultralight Dyneema tents and set our focus on the much more affordable nylon and polyester options. The Six Moon Designs Lunar Solo ($260, 26 oz.) can be had for less with free shipping and a sign-up discount, and if you catch it on sale it can even go for under $200. The Lunar Solo is roomy for one, fitting either standard or wide pads. The REI Co-op Half Dome Series of tents with a 2-person as well as a 3-person option has also been a go-to choice for many years.
The REI Co-op Flash Series of tents offer lighter weight options, and can typically be found on sale at intervals throughout the year. The venerable Six Moon Designs Lunar Duo can also be found in their heavier but much cheaper polyester Outfitter Tent version, which will get you a palace for 2 people in a package under 4lbs. for around $200. If you’re looking to save and aren’t too picky on an exact model, checking the REI Co-op Outlet from time to time can lead to some good savings on a variety of tent models from various manufacturers.
Summary: Best Budget Backpacking Tents
Six Moon Designs Lunar Solo
REI Co-op Half Dome Series
REI Co-op Flash Series
Lunar Duo Outfitter
REI Co-op Outlet Tents
If you’re looking to save some cash but still want a great tent, the SMD Lunar Solo is a venerable choice in this category for solo use. For two, look to the Lunar Duo Outfitter also from Six Moon Designs. The REI Co-op Half Dome series make for a traditional choice, with the REI Co-op Flash series offering some weight savings, and it’s always worth browsing the REI Co-op Outlet to see what’s on sale.
Best 4-Season Backpacking Tents
All the tents listed here thus far are primarily targeted towards 3-season use, but if you’re wanting to extend your trips into winter where heavy snow load can be expected and freestanding features become more important, you’ll need to look into 4-season options. The Black Diamond Firstlight 2P ($550, 54 oz.) has been a popular option for solo and 2-person use for years – you can find our full review of the Firstlight 2P tent here. If you like the Firstlight but want a little more space for 2 people, look at the Black Diamond Firstlight 3P ($600, 64 oz.). Black Diamond also offers their Hilight 3P tent, which is very similar to the Firstlight except with upgraded features at a weight penalty.

Tarptent Scarp 2 4-season tent
For my use, I like the Tarptent Scarp 2 ($400, 56 oz.), however the weight is getting up there with the crossing poles and you’ll need to set a couple snow anchors with this one. For more, take a look at our Tarptent Scarp 2 review. When it comes to 4-season tents and winter backpacking, you don't want to make any compromises in regards to protection from the elements or the sturdiness of your tent, and extra weight carried here is typically worth it.
Summary: Best 4-Season Backpacking Tents
Black Diamond Firstlight 2P
Black Diamond Firstlight 3P
Black Diamond Hilight 3P
Tarptent Scarp 2
For winter and 4-season usage the Scarp 2 from Tarptent is my choice, be it a solo or 2-person trip. However and as you might expect, Black Diamond has plenty of choices in this category that are among the most popular 4-season tents of all time.
Final Thoughts
Overall when selecting the best backpacking tent you need to find a balance between weather and bug protection, weight, space, and price – and getting that balance just right will be a little different for each of us. However, with hundreds of options on the market the perfect tent is likely out there for everyone no matter your needs.
For more on baseline information and factors to consider when choosing a backpacking tent or shelter, see our guide on how to choose a backpacking tent that goes into tent design and factors to consider on a more overall and general level. For a list of additional backpacking tents to consider from various manufacturers that you can narrow down by capacity, season, and more, check out this page at REI.com.

Finding a great backpacking sleeping pad is the next logical step in getting your backpacking gear all set once you’ve decided on the big 3 (tent, sleeping bag, backpack). The sleeping pad rounds out what’s known as the big 4 in backpacking – and this list makes up some of the most important gear you’ll carry, with these items typically also including the most expensive items you need to purchase and also representing the items where you can save the most weight.

In this guide, we’ll look at the best backpacking sleeping pads that you can find on the market today. Note that in this guide, we’ll list the specs for the regular size if possible (generally 72x20 inches) and list the r-value as well – the higher the value the warmer the pad.
Best Summer & Ultralight Backpacking Sleeping Pads
For those that are looking to focus on a summer season specific sleeping pad and / or are looking for an ultralight solution for warmer seasons, there are a few standout choices on the market that weigh less than a pound.
First, if you’re a backpacker just looking for set and forget type reliability and if you’re the type of sleeper that can find comfort in just about any flat place, the venerable closed cell foam sleeping pad could work, and will save some cash as well. The Therm-a-Rest Z Lite SOL (14 ounces, $60, 2.0 r-value), is a folding foam pad that makes packing easier (but as a foam pad, still bulky). This pad is a little light on the r-value, but would be sufficient for summer trips with moderate lows well above freezing.

The NEMO Switchback folding pad (15 ounces, $60, 2.0 r-value) is a competing option in this regard and worth equal consideration. For more, see our review of the NEMO Switchback. These foam pads are also great as a sit pad outside the tent and on breaks during the hiking day.
Most backpackers will want more sleeping comfort than a foam pad can offer however. For the lightest of the ultralight insulated inflatable sleeping pads, look no further than to the NEMO Tensor Elite (9 ounces, $250, 2.4 r-value). This new for 2025 pad will offer warmth for summer trips above freezing for most people and offers inflatable comfort, albeit in a mummy shape – this pad is all about saving weight. It should be noted that this pad utilizes 10 denier shell fabrics; extra care will need to be exercised.
NEMO also offers their Tensor Trail Ultralight (14 ounces, $190, 2.8 r-value) that doesn’t quite have the warmth to weight of some of their other pads that we’ll discuss later, but this pad is a bit lighter and makes this category.

The NEMO valve system allows for easy inflation, deflation, and fine-tuning of comfort level.
Exped has offered some of our favorite sleeping pads over the years, and in this category they offer their 1R and 3R pads, with both coming in either mummy or rectangular designs. The Exped Ultra 1R mummy sleeping pad (11 ounces, $120, 1.3 r-value) isn’t insulated, and with this low of an r-value this will only be suitable for the warmest of summer trips.

Ever since the Synmat series, Exped has offered value and all-around sleeping pad performance.
To me, the Exped Ultra 3R insulated pad (13 ounces, 2.9 r-value, $140) is a much more interesting pad. I’ve taken predecessors of this pad down to freezing or just a bit below, and lower than that combined with a thin ultralight foam pad (1/8" CCF foam). Again, Exped makes a rectangular 3R as well, but at a pound we are perhaps delving into the category to follow.

I've found that quilted construction in a sleeping pad (as seen above), or vertical baffles (baffles running head to toe) are the most comfortable and help to keep you on the pad. With a wide enough sleeping pad it's not a deal breaker.
However for me the leader in this category would be the Therm-a-Rest NeoAir XLite NXT (13 ounces, $210, 4.5 r-value) and this is an interesting pad because it’s also a leader in our next category as well. This pad has the ultralight weight that puts it in this category, and with the 4.5 r-value you likely won’t need to worry about warmth on summer trips. Looking for an ultralight pad for fast and light summer trips but that also packs warmth for the shoulder seasons? It’s a tall task to beat this pad for that type of use case.
Summary: Best Summer & Ultralight Backpacking Sleeping Pads
Therm-a-Rest Z Lite SOL
NEMO Switchback
NEMO Tensor Elite
NEMO Tensor Trail Ultralight
Exped Ultra 1R
Exped Ultra 3R
Therm-a-Rest NeoAir XLite NXT
Best 3-Season and All-Around Sleeping Pads
This is your all-around, bread and butter sleeping pad category. While weights may not be the most ultralight due to the needed increase of r-value for 3-season and shoulder season temperatures, recent advances in sleeping pad technology (it all started with the original Therm-a-Rest NeoAir) have allowed for some very intriguing options to hit the market. Weights here are generally around a pound or just a little more, with insulation that should be good to freezing or a bit below.

Choices in this category can be quickly narrowed down to just a few options. The best options include the NEMO Tensor All Season sleeping pad (around $220, 1lb) which is an excellent choice for 3-season use where warmth is appreciated, but it still might get chilly to below freezing at night with a possible cold snap taking things down to the 20s or below, or for cold sleepers any time of the year. With a 5.4 r-value and a rectangular sleeping shape, this pad has a warmth to weight to sleeping and packing space ratio that would have seemed impossible a decade ago. The NEMO Tensor All Season is my pick as the top overall sleeping pad currently on the market.

For those looking to save more weight, the Therm-a-Rest NeoAir XLite NXT ($210, 13 ounces in the regular mummy, 4.5 r-value) again gets the weight down to an even more ultralight level with sufficient warmth for 3-season trips, and will save some space in the tent and pack if needed. This pad is also available in a rectangular shape – the NeoAir NXT MAX, which would be my choice if going with the NeoAir in this category, for the additional comfort. While the NeoAir line comes with an inflation bag that works well, it’s unfortunately not adequate to utilize as a dry sack for gear, as can be found in the Exped Schnozzel. That said it is included, and any inflatable pad these days should come with some type of inflation bag / solution.

Inflation bag included with NEMO sleeping pads
The great thing about these two pads is that they are light enough to be very justifiable for summer trips, have the warmth needed for shoulder season use, and can even be used for winter backpacking if you add in a foam pad to your system to boost the total r-value.
New for 2026, Exped has released their Ultra 6.5R sleeping pad line (16 ounces, $200, 6.9 r-value) which takes their venerable synthetically-insulated sleeping pads and also adds in reflective foil to boost warmth. If you want to sleep warm and are looking for a lightweight, but perhaps not ultralight sleeping pad, this would be a sleeping pad line to strongly consider. While at a 6.9 r-value this line will work in the next section as well, the weight specs do put this line in the all-around category.
Summary: Best 3-Season and All-Around Sleeping Pads
NEMO Tensor All Season
Therm-a-Rest NeoAir XLite NXT
Therm-a-Rest NeoAir NXT MAX
Exped Ultra 6.5R Line
Best Winter Backpacking Sleeping Pads
If you’re looking for a dedicated winter backpacking sleeping pad however, pads from NEMO and Therm-a-Rest again rise to the top. The NEMO Tensor Extreme Conditions Ultralight Insulated sleeping pad (18 ounces, $250, 8.5 r-value) isn’t the most lightweight in length of name but offers a very impressive weight to r-value specification and comes in multiple shapes and sizes.
The NeoAir XTherm NXT sleeping pad (16 ounces, $240, 7.3 r-value in the regular mummy) from Therm-a-Rest is available in either a weight saving mummy shape (previous link) or in their XTherm MAX version in a larger, more comfortable rectangular version.

These pads are very impressive on the spec sheet and in regards to warmth to weight ratio, achieving a warmth to weight to bulk combo that would have seemed impossible to achieve a couple decades ago. However, I prefer to use my all-around 3-season type sleeping pads combined with foam pads (Therm-a-Rest RidgeRest, etc.) for winter backpacking. The r-values add up, and the foam pad offers some redundancy in extremely cold conditions.
As mentioned in the previous section, another pad to look at will be the Exped Ultra 6.5R line. At a 6.9 r-value this line could be used in winter conditions but at 16 ounces for the standard size would work for your 3-season trips, as well.
Summary: Best Winter Backpacking Sleeping Pads
Tensor Extreme Conditions UL Insulated
NeoAir XTherm NXT
XTherm MAX
Add-on Closed Cell Foam Pads
Exped Ultra 6.5R
Best Women’s Backpacking Sleeping Pads
Any sleeping pad in this article can be used by either men or women. There are few women’s specific sleeping pads on the market. These are typically temperature rated such that they will be warmer per a given temperature rating.
Additionally they may be shaped differently (if mummy-shaped) – generally wider in the hips, etc. for a better fit when sleeping and / or offered in shorter versions. Note that you can always use a rectangular sleeping pad for maximum room all around and / or choose a warmer pad and in various widths / lengths.
Regardless for women’s sleeping pads – a market in constant flux – the Sea to Summit Women’s Ether Light XT Insulated (18 ounces, ~$200, 3.5 r-value) offers a plush 4” of height in a women’s specific shape, and would be suitable for most 3-season, typical conditions for an average sleeper (a thin foam pad could be added for a warmth boost).
You might also be able to find a Therm-a-Rest ProLite Plus Women’s (23 ounces, under $100 on closeout, 3.9 r-value) – note that the specs are often not listed correctly online – this is an old-school self-inflating foam mattress that offers just 1.5” of height but offers some intrigue. While this is getting a bit heavy, 30 years ago this would have been one of the most comfortable options you could get.
You can find a list of women’s backpacking sleeping pads here at REI Co-op.
Summary: Best Women’s Backpacking Sleeping Pads
Women’s Ether Light XT Insulated
Therm-a-Rest ProLite Plus Women’s

Choosing the best backpacking sleeping pad is a series of compromises – it must be comfortable enough and warm enough, but pack small enough and be light enough. This results in a compromise, but in recent years these compromises have been lessened.
Most Comfortable Backpacking Sleeping Pads & Best Wide / Long Options
When comfort is the most important consideration (although keep in mind no matter how cushy, you won’t be comfortable if you’re cold), the Therma-a-Rest NeoLoft sleeping pad ($250) will be hard to beat. This larger air mattress has nearly 5” of height, but is still reasonably backpackable at 25 ounces. With a 4.7 r-value this pad should still keep you warm in 3-season type conditions. If you’re backpacking in, but will then be setting up a basecamp for a few days, this pad might be up your alley.
For me however, I don’t quite need to go up to NeoLoft level to find comfort on the trail and thus can save a bit of weight. I like to look for a pad long enough so my feet don’t hang off the end, and wide enough that as a toss and turn side-sleeper I don’t have to worry about falling off the side. The previously mentioned NEMO Tensor All Season sleeping pad – but in the long wide version, or the NeoAir XLite NXT MAX (in the large) are leading backpacking sleeping pad comfort contenders here. 25” wide pads are appreciated in this regard, along with a pad that is slightly longer than your height combined with a good backpacking pillow.

A good backpacking pillow setup, combined with the right size sleeping pad (NEMO Tensor series shown) will go a long way towards a comfortable night on the trail.
Note that any inflatable sleeping pad will be made warmer and more comfortable if you add a closed cell foam pad underneath. If you’re only using an air pad, you’ll usually want to inflate fairly firmly for more warmth, but if using a foam pad under it you can deflate the pad to a softer firmness while still having sufficient warmth in typical conditions. And, if you toss and turn at night – instead of bottoming out the pad on hard ground, even a thin foam pad will add a surprising amount of cushion for your hips.
It should also be noted that while a very niche item, if you’re looking for a 2 person backpacking sleeping pad the Exped Ultra 3R Duo (29-41 ounces, $250, 2.9 r-value) is an intriguing choice with separate inflation chambers for each person and in Exped fashion, is a compelling choice across the board.
Summary: Most Comfortable Backpacking Sleeping Pads
Therma-a-Rest NeoLoft
NEMO Tensor All Season (in larger sizes)
NeoAir XLite NXT MAX (size large)
Add-on Closed Cell Foam Pads
Exped Ultra 3R Duo (for two)
Best Budget Backpacking Sleeping Pads
If the latest greatest technology and spreadsheet leaders aren’t your thing, more budget-oriented sleeping pads in the $150 or less range are without a doubt quite workable. A venerable choice has been the Exped line – this line has a great valve system, vertical baffles that I find help keep you on the pad, and larger outer baffles to keep you centered. The Exped Ultra 3R insulated sleeping pad (16 ounces, $140, 2.9 r-value) is my choice in this category. This pad is warm enough for 3-season backpacking, can be used as part of a system with additional foam pads in winter, and won’t break the bank. The Ultra line from Exped and their predecessor from Exped (Synmat series) have been part of my backpacking gear repertoire for years, as they offer a nice blend of warmth, weight, comfort, ease of use, and price.

If price however is of paramount importance, look to the Therm-a-Rest RidgeRest, the Therm-a-Rest Z Lite SOL, or the NEMO Switchback. These foam pads will not be the most comfortable, and depending on the sleeper may only be barely better than nothing in the comfort department, but they do add 3-season warmth and will get the job done for around $60 or less. That said, for deals on usually more expensive inflatable pads from time to time, it’s worth checking at the REI Co-op Outlet.
Summary: Best Budget Backpacking Sleeping Pads
Exped Ultra 3R
Therm-a-Rest RidgeRest
Therm-a-Rest Z Lite SOL
NEMO Switchback
REI Co-op Outlet Sleeping Pads
In Conclusion
Finding the right sleeping pad is important on the trail, both for warmth and for comfort. To some extent this all goes hand in hand – while comfort is more than just warmth, you can’t be comfortable no matter how cushy the sleeping pad if you’re cold. When I look for a sleeping pad I look for the lightest weight sleeping pad that will keep me comfortable and warm on backpacking trips, and one that is also sufficiently durable while meeting the budget while also being easy to use.
You can find a complete selection of backpacking sleeping pads mentioned in this article along with additional choices here at REI Co-op. For more on sleeping pads take a look at our article: Choosing the Best Backpacking Sleeping Pad. For more on the “Big 3” of backpacking gear, see our articles: Best Backpacking Tents by Application and Budget and Best Backpacking Sleeping Bags, as well as our Best Backpacking Backpacks Guide.

A spur of the moment side trip landed us in the Guadalupe Mountains National Park with easy access to the tallest point in Texas. Guadalupe Peak looms over the surrounding desert flatlands at a respectable 8,751 feet, accessible only after paying the price of a grueling 8.4 mile round-trip, 3000-foot elevation gain trail. This is truly a spectacular not-to-be-missed hike that comes with bragging rights for ascending the highest peak in Texas.

Located in Guadalupe Mountains National Park, Guadalupe Peak offers a challenging hike with expansive, rewarding views.
Hiking to the Summit of Guadalupe Peak
There is nothing predictable about this trail; we hiked it in early April during unseasonably cool weather and were surprised with a wide range of weather conditions. Our hike started out sunny, with warm temperatures and calm winds that changed to light wind, cooler temperatures and even a few snow flurries as we ascended toward the peak. That being the said, it’s not unusual to start out in sweltering heat and arrive at the top needing some serious cold weather gear.
We were lucky to have a break in the wind and clouds when we arrived at the top that allowed us to take time to enjoy the view of Texas and southern New Mexico to the north. This is a shoulder season hike, best hiked during the cooler months of the year. Peak seasons in the park are March through May and September through December when average high temperatures are less than 80 degrees.

The trail is well maintained and a reasonable (but constant) grade. The steepest portion is in the first couple of miles. A few sheer drop offs are not for the faint of heart. However, the trail is wide with passing room along virtually the entire trail and the cliff side paths make for impressive photos. Many families make this hike with children. Sturdy hiking shoes or boots will make the mostly rock tread easier on your feet but are not required. We opted to use trekking poles, but most hikers went up fine without them (we like to use trekking poles so we can take in the scenery with less risk of stumbling).

As you make your way up from the trailhead at roughly 5750’ to 8751’ elevation at the top you’ll notice the stark changes in your surroundings from the high desert to high elevation pinyon tree forests. The progression offers a fascinating lesson on the adaptability of flora and fauna to these unique ecosystems. We didn’t see too much in the way of wildlife on the hike, except for a few lizards on the rocks and vultures and hawks flying overhead. An earlier start would likely provide a better chance to see some of the local animals (gray fox, skunks, porcupine, mule deer, snakes, etc.).

Those that make the trek are rewarded with a 360-degree view for miles on end with mountain peaks rising from the surrounding Chihuahuan Desert. Guadalupe Mountains National Park is home to eight of the highest peaks in Texas including the impressive sheer limestone bluff, El Capitan, not to be confused with the similarly named and equally impressive rock formation in Yosemite National Park.
There is no trail to the top of El Capitan, but the best view in the park is from atop Guadalupe Peak. Off in the distance, and barely visible are the 2,000-acre gypsum sand dunes on the west side of the park. The monument on Guadalupe Peak is a quirky pyramid that was put on the peak before it became a National Park and commemorates the transcontinental overland and air mail carriers. If you plan your trip during the spring, you’re likely to see spectacular blooms that may even include the rare Guadalupe Mountain violet!

The hike starts out in the high desert and passes through high elevation pine forests. If you have an extra day, and don't mind carrying a backpack and extra water, you could camp overnight at the backcountry campsite one mile from the summit and enjoy star gazing before summiting the next morning and possibly catching sunrise from the peak. Guadalupe Mountains is sometimes described as the least visited national park, but it’s one not to be missed in our book.
Need to Know
Information
The National Park Service advises carrying one gallon of water per day and turning back when half your water is gone. There are no water sources on this trail.
No-fee backcountry wilderness permits are available at the visitor’s center up to one day in advance. The campground with five tent sites is one mile below the peak. All toilet paper and solid waste is required to be removed in a commercial toilet bag (Wag-Bag or the Restop 2, etc). One bag per person, per day is required for backpackers and you may be asked to show proof you have the required bags before obtaining your permit.
Guadalupe Mountains is in the Mountain time zone although your smart phones and other devices may try to convince you otherwise since the nearest towers transmit from the Central time zone. The sparsely populated area makes Guadalupe an ideal location for dark sky viewing. There is a fee to enter the park, however the wilderness permit is free.
Getting There
Guadalupe Mountains National Park is located in west Texas about 2 hours east of El Paso. The trailhead parking lot holds only a few cars and fills up quickly even on weekdays. There is additional parking at the visitor center and the well maintained trail to the trailhead adds a bonus mile to your hike. A quick stop at the Pine Springs Visitor Center is highly recommended for the latest forecast and sage advice. If you are planning an overnight excursion you must get a backcountry permit here.
Pine Springs Campground is located at the trailhead with 13 RV sites and 20 tent sites. These must be reserved in advance and the campground is often full. Chosa Primitive Camping Area, a much larger campground managed by the BLM is 29 miles to the northeast on the road to Carlsbad Caverns National Park. It is suitable for both tents and RVs. Chosa is a dispersed, dry camping free area with no facilities.
Best Time to Go
The best time to hike would be spring and fall to avoid possible extreme summer heat. Start early in the day.
Maps & Books
The park is covered in the National Geographic Trails Illustrated Guadalupe Mountains National Park map. In addition, the Delorme Texas Atlas can help with getting to and from this and other destinations in the state. In regards to guidebooks, see Hiking Carlsbad Caverns & Guadalupe Mountains National Parks as well as Best Easy Day Hikes Carlsbad Caverns and Guadalupe Mountains National Parks.